First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 Yes! https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221003647 The great cover-ups: no comprehensive autopsies of 'Covid-deaths' or of 'Vaccine/Toxic Injection' deaths. Ps it occurs to me that this latter term 'Vaccine/Toxic Injection' is accurate: the claim, by its proponents, is that the injected materials are toxic to the 'SARS-Cov-2 virus' (regardless of variant strain) has, of necessity, the associated toxicity-spectrum of all *consequential* 'adverse effects'. It is the opportunity for forensic post-mortem and post-injection studies to revel truth in these matters.

 First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2

Yes!

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221003647

The great cover-ups: no comprehensive autopsies of 'Covid-deaths' or of 'Vaccine/Toxic Injection' deaths.

Ps it occurs to me that this latter term 'Vaccine/Toxic Injection' is accurate: the claim, by its proponents, is that the injected materials are toxic to the 'SARS-Cov-2 virus' (regardless of variant strain) has, of necessity, the associated toxicity-spectrum of all *consequential* 'adverse effects'.

Postscript:

In response to a request for ckarification, I offered:

Thanks, Steve, for asking: I'm saying that, in respect of the double-v (virus and vaccine), data rather than rhetoric is the better guide.

And, that, along with whole-society data (epidemiology) on 'net deaths' etc, dispassionate single-event data provided by autopsies of both post-Covid death cases and post-injection cases are going to be illuminating.

That is why such vital (sic) autopsies have been blocked from, bothm being undertaken.

And publicised.

Hence my highlighting this scientific publication; which I consider to be of First-class importance.

Again, thanks for asking.

It is the opportunity for forensic post-mortem and post-injection studies to revel truth in these matters.