Monday, November 6, 2017

Wellness not Illness

First frost of the winter in Beckenham.




And our Housing Association-provided heating broke down again yesterday.

So we're dressed up like Innu (' Like Eskimos' in the old days: though why that name was changed, I don't know).

The meta point is that, here in Bromley, the Tory/capitalists choice to impose austerity on the poor mean that, for us as examples, we are being crushed innan anvil of two opposing wedges: when I moved in here, to Coleridge House, to a flat which was so ribby that not-one on the housing waiting list would take it (and Bromley refused to put me on the Housing Waiting List as being homeless, which I was, deeming me to be, as a 'non-vulnerable adult man', voluntarily homeless and voluntarily unemployed and, so, voluntarily unwilling to take a private landlord's ' lease'), Coleridge House was still described as 'Sheltered Housing'.

But the vice of austerity was already being applied by the Tory capitalists: Bromley Tories had already taken away funding to Housing Associations for schems managers at Sheltered Housing units, so we were already on our own when problems arose.

Riverside, 'our' Housing Association, tried to bridge that gap by asking us to pay £5 a week to pay for an excellent, but part time Social Worker. But, when someone complained about that payment, even that part-time cover was stopped.

Add to that, that the Bromley Tory capitalists had taken the Tory+Fib Dem capitalists' 'option' of clawing back, and eventually, abolishing our low-income Council Tax (property tax) rebate/ Benefit/now renamed Council Tax Support, the vice was being tightened.

And we're getting older, iller, more disabled, more isolated: the opposing jaw of the twin wedge austerity vice.

So, Riverside has renamed us. First we're no longer Tenants, but Customers. Second Coleridge House, etc, is no longer 'Sheltered Housing' but is renamed as 'Retirement Living'.

And, as of May last year, we're the subjects of 'A Decant': where we're being gold to find (with 'an assistance package') somewhere else to live.

So far, of our house of twelve singletons, getting older and iller, and one elderly couple (ditto) five have moved into isolated accommodation, two more are in process of doing so and two have died.

The vice of austerity bites.

And all the while, Tory Capitalist Bromley uses the 'Benefits' system to grind down our immune systems, in the unstated hopes that the two of my neighbours who 'have lost their lives' become three or more.

Or that we'll slip up/be slipped up by missing a deadline (how apt a phrase) in yet one more demand for evidence of income, capital, 'change of circumstances'.

Of course, the altetnative exists.

Let's bring about The Wellbeing Society as an evolution on from The Welfare State.

Let's Socialise the Economy rather that re-Nationalise, with compensation, this pernicious wickedness called capitalism.

And, rather than pay usury, let's have an interest-free, not-for-profit money, banking and finance system as a transition from capitalism, through Co-operative Socialism, to an Economy of Love, Peace, Freedom and Voluntary Contribution.

By Tuesday!

---------------

John Courtneidge 6th November 2017

Saturday, October 28, 2017

History of the Terms 'Socialist' and 'Socialism'

In CR Fay's book, 'Life and Labour in The Nineteenth Century', Co-operative Socialism became the evolved name for Owenite Socialism.

See at page 70 in Chapter VII, 'The Origins of Britiash Socialism':

https://archive.org/stream/lifelabourinnine00faycuoft#page/n14/mode/1up

Thanks Gillian Lonergan at The Co-operative College for this URL!

Incidentally, the earlist written indication of the work 'socialist' seems to be 1822.

See ref 8 at:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_socialism

"socialist". Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. September 2005. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.): "1822 E.Cowper Let. to Robert Owen 2 Nov. in Revue d'Histoire Economique & Sociale (1957) 35 80 [She] seems well adapted to become what my friend Jo. Applegath calls a Socialist."

While another early reference to the word 'socialist' is in a letter to Robert Owens' brother, William, in 1824: see pages 69-70 in the CR Fay book, 'Life . . ' referred to earlier:

https://archive.org/stream/lifelabourinnine00faycuoft#page/69/mode/1up

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Emotions, Politics and Personalities

Ps, the Political Compass map is as below.







In a ppt called 'Emotions, Politics and Personalities' in the papers'section at www.interestfreemoney.org I yry to relate each quadrant to an emotional state.

Please note, if reading that, two things:

A) I flip the horizontal axis so that the two Progressive quadrants (ie the two Left quadrants on the Political Compass map, red and green) are on the right-hand side of the page. That way, a reading across the page reads from Reactionary to Progressive;

B) I like the True Colors approach, which scores each of us as a blend of all four quadrants. This reflects our mixes if all emotions and may be related to the four brain/neuro-active molecules that Helen Fisher suggests may be rekated to 'each' Personality Type (see the Emotions, etc ppt referred to above);

Well, three things:

C) Finally, there's something that I've yet to get to the bottom of. And that's the observation that, a bit like a Rubrick's Cube twist, the two haves of these maps often seem to twist about the verical axis: so that, in the Political Compass map, as below, purple ends up next to red and blue next to green . . . Odd . . .something related to bipolar, scitsophrenia (sp?) Conditions, perhaps?

Sunday, September 24, 2017

Anti-semitism not!

The slur that The Labour Party is anti-semitic is, both, a nonsense and a Conservative plot.

In 53 years' involvement, on and off, as a Labour Party member, activist and electoral candidate I have *never* heard an anti-semitic comment from a Labour Party member.

The proposal that the Zionist imposition on Palestine was a socialist experiment is, again, a Conservative plot: the Irgun, for example, was a violent land-grab organisation, as part of that Zionist land-grab.

It is more likely that Zionists (and not all Jews are Zionists, nor are all Zionists, Jews) are Conservative Nationalists: effectively, in their actions, Conservative Land-theives (shades of the Conservative land-theives: the 'inheritors' of the Norman Conquest).

Indeed, my expectation is that some/many/most Conservatives are pro-Zionist anti-semites . . . (Toryism was never logical.)

Finally, the Zionists are anti-semitic: in that their demand that Zionism is a cipher (code) for the Jewish identity corrals, kr attempts to corral, all Jews into the Conservative, Zionist, pro-capitalist falsity.

It, for example, leaves discussion of two relevant questions, at least, away from the table: first, why have 'The Jews' been vilified so often and for so long in Pogroms? Are such event economic at base?

Secondly, is it authentic Judaism to claim that 'The Jews' are somehow 'different/better' than everyone else: as in 'We, The Chosen People', concept?

Finally, my dad was at Cable Street facing down the genuinely anti-Semitic fascists in the 1930's.  I, too hot-blooded, could never be part of such acts of socialist resistance. But I am fully in solidarity with my anti-Zionist Jewish friends.

And hope that the conversion of Palestine into a seculat Co-operative Commonwealth, along the lines of the plan for Co-operative Socialism, comes about soon.

By Tuesday!

In peace, for all,

Your Quaker, Democratic and Co-operative Socialist, pacifist F/friend

John Courtneidge

Co-operative Careship

Re:

 https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2017/09/23/capital-150-part-two-the-economic-reason-for-madness/

Thanks, Gianne for pointing to this​​!

Oh, those sorry Marxists!

To take two points:

Marx didn't use the term 'Surplus Value': he wrote in German the term 'mehre vorth' (I may have that spelling wrong) which my German speaking friend translates as 'more worth' or 'added value': the term that I and the UK Taxman uses (in 'His' term, for Sales' Tax', 'Value-Added Tax', VAT).

Second this 'Free Gift of Nature' nonsense . . . Our Saskatoon Friend, Dave (I forget his family name) pointed to the concept that "rivers-have-rights'.  As such, the North Saskatchewan River has not consented (as a 'Free Gift of Nature'), nor would it ever likely do so, to be exploited and polluted as the capialists' Tar Sands holocaust!

Hence, by contrast, the Co-operative Socialist notion that 'the land , rivers, sea and air, should be considered to 'own' themselves - be persons in their own right - and that human inter-action with such 'God-given, God-containing, 'Gifts-of-nature'' should be on the basis of time-limited, non-heritable/non-transferable agreements for 'Co-operative Careship'.

Thanks, again, Gianne,

Best!

John

****

Sunday, June 4, 2017

The UK General Election Choice: Terrorism or Co-operative Socialism

 The UK General Election Choice: Terrorism or Co-operative Socialism

Terrorism:  a first attempt at commentary.

This may not be good enough, but . . .

We know from social epidemiology (eg The Spirit Level book and www.equalitytrust.org.uk) that the amount of violence in a society increases as economic/income inequality increases.

And that inequality has increased/been increased since 1979.

Put simply: happy people are, generally, not violent.

And, as inequality increases, happiness decreases.

So violence increases.

We've been here before.

Before the First World War was declared in 1914, 'The Politics of The Act' was a feature of political life: bombs were thrown, 'elite' individuals were shot and assassinated.

Barbara Tuchman's book, 'The Leaning Tower', if I recall right, describes those events.

As a result, inequality was decreased from the end of that war: from about 1920 onwards. Danny Dorling's books display a U-shaped curve from 1900 to 2000: increased equality until 1979 then 'the counter revolution' of, first, neo-liberal capitalism and, now, neo-conservative capitalism.

Both designed ' to make the 'rich' richer and the 'poor' poorer'.

Which they did.

Now, just as the earlier era of  'The Politics of The Act', political acts of violence ('War as Regime Change' and 'Terrorism' as kick-back) are an *inevitable* consequence.

The bombing in Manchester, the events, yesterday evening in London, and so on, were not a matter of 'if': more a matter of 'when'.

The responses of the frightened 'elites' will be/ are predictable.

First Militarised Martial law. And the suspension of democracy.

Second, an (even greater) restriction on free speech (including public democratic politics: such as the suspension of General Election campaigning, as has happened, today and last Tuesday) and so on.

For now I leave the question open as to whether the acts of Terrorism in the UK were coordinated.

But, rather, turn to a positive response.

So, as outlined in the first few sentences above:

    If you wish for peace, you have to work for economic- and income-equality.

    2. Capitalism cannot do that:

   - as the history of the last hundred years has shown, managed capitalism (fascism/ Nazism on the political 'right' and 'Social Democracy' on the 'left'), both created more and more inequality.

And thus more and more violence.

So, what of 'not-caplitalism' . . . ?

Or, rather, what of other 'Not-capitalism*s*'?

Well, first of all, the hierarchical, usually Marxism-inspired, Not-capitaisms have ended in tears (in the cases of Cuba, Noth Korea and China, time will tell).

Which leaves us with Co-operative Socialism: a plan *specifically designed* to create (greater) equality and equity.

And thus peace.

Along with ecological responsibility and sustainability.


Therefore:

All that's now needed, is the implementation of the plan for Co-operative Socialism . . .

A Labour and Co-operative government at Westminster could do that.

Hence the importance of the UK General Election.

This coming Thursday 8th June 2017.

Sunday, April 9, 2017

Progress on Co-operative Socialism: Synopsis and Overview April 2017

My friend, Rajula Singh asks how I am.

I reply, on this atonishing dawn morning in Beckenham.









Terrible, really. I'm a Doctor. I'm good at healing patients. But none of the patients want too be healed. So, I'm miserable.

People are miserable when their needs are not met.

Con-versely, people are happy when their needs *are* met.

And they *can* be met . . . if people want to have their needs met.

But, it seems, they don't want their needs met.

So, I'm unhappy; miserable: since my need is to have my needs met.

Which is to have my love for all accepted. Which it's not. So I'm unhappy.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Iq0XJCJ1Srw

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAuoNa5g6i8

Ps Needs essay in the papers' section at www.interestfreemoney.org

The key need to is equality (see www.equalitytrust.org.uk) and the plan for equality is called Co-operative Socialism (eg, with You Tube videos, at:

http://occupylondon.org.uk/co-operative-socialism-by-john-courtneidge/

The next steps towards implementation, audit and celebration of a world of Co-operative Socialism is for individuals to ask if their MP supports the plan for Co-operative Socialism.

And, if yes, are they promoting it?

And, if no, they don't support it, why not?

A model Constituent's letter template for this is as above or in the essays at www.sustainabilitynotcapitalism.blogspot.com

As is a model Motion that Organisations could adopt.

Which, put simply says:

We adopt, and will promote, the plan for Co-operative Socialism, as an alternative to capitalism.

Which is what Labour Action for Peace, LAP (in 2013), The Bromley Co-operative Party (in 2014) and Occupy London (in 2015) have already done.

LAP is active in supporting and promoting the plannfor Co-operative Socialism by, for example, correlating the replies from MPs to the Constituents' letters described above. 

Progress is, however, slow. So! I'm miserable!

But:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kafVkPxjLYg

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fip6uNJeLl0

Meanwhile, in the world:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fCP2-Bfhy04

Or, better, perhaps:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YoDh_gHDvkk

Chttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zUQiUFZ5RDw

But:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ9rUzIMcZQ

And:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bsYp9q3QNaQ

So, not so much:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NSkboTTTmpg

Which is lovely, but:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dsxtImDVMig

Which as an exercise in Co-operative Socialism:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cT_fKY34Hx0

All we/I! Need is love, equality, Co-operative Socialism!

(And, of course, my heart beloved . . . )

So, I wonder how many people will write *their* letter tom*their* MP (www.theyworkforyou.com), today, this week, ever?

Terrible, really. I'm a Doctor. I'm good at healing patients. But none of the patients want too be healed. So, I'm miserable.

People are miserable when their needs are not met.

Con-versely, people are happy when their needs *are* met.

And they *can* be met . . . if people want to have their needs met.

But, it seems, they don't want their needs met.

So, I'm unhappy; miserable: since my need is to have my needs met.

Which is to have my love for all accepted. Which it's not. So I'm unhappy.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Iq0XJCJ1Srw

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAuoNa5g6i8

Ps Needs essay in the papers' section at www.interestfreemoney.org

The key need to is equality (see www.equalitytrust.org.uk) and the plan for equality is called Co-operative Socialism (eg, with You Tube videos, at:

http://occupylondon.org.uk/co-operative-socialism-by-john-courtneidge/

The next steps towards implementation, audit and celebration of a world of Co-operative Socialism is for individuals to ask if their MP supports the plan for Co-operative Socialism.

And, if yes, are they promoting it?

And, if no, they don't support it, why not?

A model Constituent's letter template for this is as above or in the essays at www.sustainabilitynotcapitalism.blogspot.com

As is a model Motion that Organisations could adopt.

Which, put simply says:

We adopt, and will promote, the plan for Co-operative Socialism, as an alternative to capitalism.

Which is what Labour Action for Peace, LAP (in 2013), The Bromley Co-operative Party (in 2014) and Occupy London (in 2015) have already done.

LAP is active in supporting and promoting the plannfor Co-operative Socialism by, for example, correlating the replies from MPs to the Constituents' letters described above. 

Progress is, however, slow. So! I'm miserable!

But:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kafVkPxjLYg

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fip6uNJeLl0

Meanwhile, in the world:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fCP2-Bfhy04

Or, better, perhaps:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YoDh_gHDvkk

Chttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zUQiUFZ5RDw

But:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ9rUzIMcZQ

And:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bsYp9q3QNaQ

So, not so much:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NSkboTTTmpg

Which is lovely, but:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dsxtImDVMig

Which as an exercise in Co-operative Socialism:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cT_fKY34Hx0

All we/I! Need is love, equality, Co-operative Socialism!

(And, of course, my heart beloved . . .

But, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WyWzrKjeeAQ . . . )

So, I wonder how many people will write *their* letter to *their* MP (www.theyworkforyou.com), today, this week, ever?